A physical claim is only as good as its instrument, its calibration and its record form. These are the obligations a physical result would have to meet. No measurement value appears anywhere on this page, because none has been supplied.
Numeric tolerances are deliberately absent. A tolerance set by this estate would be a fabricated figure. Each obligation requires the examining protocol to declare its tolerance before measurement begins, so the bound cannot be chosen after the result is known.
Calibrated dimensional measurement instrument, calibration record required.
Tolerance is declared by the examining protocol before measurement, and is not set after seeing the result.
Per-measurement record carrying value, instrument identity, calibration reference, operator, date and the raw instrument output.
Calibrated balance or equivalent, with range covering the object and a stated resolution.
Tolerance fixed in advance as an absolute bound, with the resolution of the instrument stated.
Repeated measurements with raw output retained, plus the calibration reference and the operator.
Metering appropriate to the input, with the metering point and boundary stated.
The accounting boundary is declared before measurement, and gains outside that boundary are counted against the claim.
Time series of input and output, with the boundary diagram, the metering point and the calibration reference.
Temperature and humidity logging, logged for the full measurement window.
A declared window for each condition, agreed before the run; excursions outside it invalidate the run.
Continuous log with timestamps, covering the whole measurement window without gaps.
An obligation states the shape a credible record takes. It says nothing about whether the measurement was taken. Publishing the obligation is useful because it makes a future record checkable, and because it shows what is still absent rather than letting silence read as agreement.
BW Proof is an evidence estate, not a live BW runtime, not a certification, and not an independent audit. Nothing here substitutes for an examiner inspecting real artefacts.